Using git reflog these commits can be restored and the entire rebase can be undone. At first glance this can appear as though the commits are permanently gone. Running rebase in interactive mode and executing subcommands like squash or drop will remove commits from your branche's immediate log. The -continue and -abort command line arguments can be passed to git rebase to advance or reset the the rebase when dealing with conflicts.Ī more serious rebase caveat is lost commits from interactive history rewriting. This is easily remedied by rebasing your branch frequently against main, and making more frequent commits. Eventually you will want to rebase against main and at that time it may contain many new commits that your branch changes may conflict with. This occurs if you have a long-lived branch that has strayed from main. One caveat to consider when working with Git Rebase is merge conflicts may become more frequent during a rebase workflow. This is how interactive rebasing can keep a project's history clean and meaningful. To everybody else, it looks like you're a brilliant developer who implemented the new feature with the perfect amount of commits the first time around.

The real power of interactive rebasing can be seen in the history of the resulting main branch. To everybody else, it will look like the entire feature was developed in a single series of well-planned commits. This gives them the opportunity to squash insignificant commits, delete obsolete ones, and make sure everything else is in order before committing to the “official” project history. Most developers like to use an interactive rebase to polish a feature branch before merging it into the main code base. This affords a lot of freedom to developers, as it lets them commit a 'messy' history while they're focused on writing code, then go back and clean it up after the fact. Interactive rebasing gives you complete control over what your project history looks like.

Meld git windows